All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Unix-domain sockets - abstract addresses
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 13:20:09 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1160.1029122409@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 11 Aug 2002 19:59:06 MST." <20020811.195906.107999483.davem@redhat.com>

On Sun, 11 Aug 2002 19:59:06 -0700 (PDT), 
"David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com> wrote:
>I don't like this solution, please fix this right and get rid of the
>limitations at their source.
>
>If I name a module "foo" and this causes "fo" to become a defined
>CPP symbol in when compiling the sources for that module, that is
>completely broken!
>
>net/unix is just a trite example.  How about a driver for device "foo"
>that has a member "foo" in one of it's structures?  They have to get
>this undef thing too or rename their module, that's rediculious.

I think you misunderstood the problem.  Calling a driver "foo" does not
make "foo" a cpp symbol.  The problem here is that 'unix' is a driver
name and also a symbol that is defined by gcc.


  reply	other threads:[~2002-08-12  3:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-08-08 16:15 Unix-domain sockets - abstract addresses Michael Procter
2002-08-08 18:36 ` kuznet
2002-08-09  0:29   ` Thunder from the hill
2002-08-09 13:52   ` Michael Procter
2002-08-09 16:15     ` kuznet
2002-08-09 22:33     ` Thunder from the hill
2002-08-10  1:05       ` David S. Miller
2002-08-10  1:35         ` Keith Owens
2002-08-10  1:41           ` David S. Miller
2002-08-10  2:19             ` Keith Owens
2002-08-10  2:15               ` David S. Miller
2002-08-10 10:59               ` Roman Zippel
2002-08-12  2:35               ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-08-12  2:59                 ` Keith Owens
2002-08-12  2:59                   ` David S. Miller
2002-08-12  3:20                     ` Keith Owens [this message]
2002-08-12  3:13                       ` David S. Miller
2002-08-12  3:57                         ` Keith Owens
2002-08-12  7:13                           ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-08-12 14:28                           ` David Woodhouse
2002-08-10  6:29         ` Thunder from the hill

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1160.1029122409@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com \
    --to=kaos@ocs.com.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.