From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932084AbWJHWx5 (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Oct 2006 18:53:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932085AbWJHWx5 (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Oct 2006 18:53:57 -0400 Received: from www.osadl.org ([213.239.205.134]:56512 "EHLO mail.tglx.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932084AbWJHWx4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Oct 2006 18:53:56 -0400 Subject: Re: + clocksource-increase-initcall-priority.patch added to -mm tree From: Thomas Gleixner Reply-To: tglx@linutronix.de To: Daniel Walker Cc: akpm@osdl.org, johnstul@us.ibm.com, mingo@elte.hu, zippel@linux-m68k.org, LKML In-Reply-To: <1160345593.3693.180.camel@c-67-180-230-165.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> References: <200610070153.k971ren4020838@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> <1160294812.22911.8.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1160302797.22911.37.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1160319033.3693.19.camel@c-67-180-230-165.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> <1160319234.5686.12.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1160322317.3693.47.camel@c-67-180-230-165.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> <1160323127.5686.37.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1160324288.3693.71.camel@c-67-180-230-165.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> <1160326363.5686.48.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1160327879.3693.97.camel@c-67-180-230-165.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> <1160334205.5686.72.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1160339986.3693.135.camel@c-67-180-230-165.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> <1160340722.5686.85.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1160342112.3693.146.camel@c-67-180-230-165.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> <1160342424.5686.102.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1160343099.3693.153.camel@c-67-180-230-165.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> <1160343506.5686.113.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1160345593.3693.180.camel@c-67-180-230-165.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 00:53:56 +0200 Message-Id: <1160348036.5686.155.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 15:13 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote: > On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 23:38 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > > > I don't see that behaviour on my machines and nobody complains about > > that. I don't care about stale comments. Point me to a bug report > > instead of your perception of what's optimal and not. > > Let both do this. Lets discuss empirical behavior. Otherwise we aren't > making any progress. Go, grep the LKML archives and let those who had problems test your modifications. Come back when they confirm that it does not change anything. You want to change behaviour of the current code, so it's your job to verify that it does not break anything. I have been there and done that with the ARM interrupt code http://www.linutronix.de/index.php?page=testing I know what I'm talking about. tglx