From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lee Revell Subject: Re: Surround sound and volume control question Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 10:42:56 -0400 Message-ID: <1160404977.629.22.camel@mindpipe> References: <20061008222726.GA23855@nevyn.them.org> <20061009134539.GA13343@nevyn.them.org> <1160402124.629.16.camel@mindpipe> <20061009143814.GA14827@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20061009143814.GA14827@nevyn.them.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: Takashi Iwai , alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 10:38 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > I did consider doing it this way over the weekend. However, being > able to adjust the relative volumes of the different channels still > seems useful to me. If you have a single unified control, then you > mess up trying to move the others. > > What do you think? Should I just slave them all together and remove > the other volume controls? It's probably easier; it just seems > somehow lacking. > How do other OSes do it? Do they also force everything through a software volume control? Is a ganged master control fundamentally incompatible with individual channel volumes? If so, doesn't it mean that this problem can never be solved by an abstract mixer layer? Lee ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV