From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] Adeos/Xenomai Arm Port From: Philippe Gerum In-Reply-To: <45349671.2050500@domain.hid> References: <1161013724.5503.65.camel@domain.hid> <1161034219.5131.81.camel@domain.hid> <45349113.2010700@domain.hid> <45349671.2050500@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 11:54:27 +0200 Message-Id: <1161078867.5154.0.camel@domain.hid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: rpm@xenomai.org List-Id: Help regarding installation and common use of Xenomai List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gilles Chanteperdrix Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org On Tue, 2006-10-17 at 10:38 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > > All benchmark drivers (timerbench, switchtest and irqbench) use the > > /dev/rttest%d devices, the device index is passed to latency > > and irqbench using the -D option whereas switchtest uses the ioctl error > > to find the correct device. So this error might simply be the sign that > > Manfred did not pass the -D option to latency. > > Or that Xenomai was compiled without the timerbench driver. No, you would get -ENODEV, with a failure on the opening of the device. > -- Philippe.