From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
To: sergio@sergiomb.no-ip.org
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>,
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>,
Manish Lachwani <mlachwani@mvista.com>,
bastien.dugue@bull.net
Subject: Re: -rt7 announcement? (was Re: 2.6.18-rt6)
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 16:40:49 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1161636049.3982.18.camel@mindpipe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1161635161.2948.12.camel@localhost.portugal>
On Mon, 2006-10-23 at 21:26 +0100, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
> rt7 should be to be applied on 2.6.18.1
> still for 2.6.18
>
The -rt patch has always been against the most recent base kernel. It
could be rebased against -stable but that would be more work for the
maintainers...
Lee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-23 20:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-18 8:39 2.6.18-rt6 Ingo Molnar
2006-10-18 9:14 ` 2.6.18-rt6 Sébastien Dugué
2006-10-18 10:05 ` 2.6.18-rt6 Ingo Molnar
2006-10-18 14:53 ` 2.6.18-rt6 Paul E. McKenney
2006-10-18 21:07 ` 2.6.18-rt6 Esben Nielsen
2006-10-20 0:23 ` 2.6.18-rt6 Sergio Monteiro Basto
2006-10-20 0:59 ` 2.6.18-rt6 john stultz
2006-10-23 20:33 ` 2.6.18-rt6 and compile fail with rt7 on x86_64 Sergio Monteiro Basto
2006-10-20 15:00 ` 2.6.18-rt6 Lee Revell
2006-10-20 15:53 ` 2.6.18-rt6 Mark Knecht
2006-10-23 16:34 ` -rt7 announcement? (was Re: 2.6.18-rt6) Lee Revell
2006-10-23 18:29 ` Mark Knecht
2006-10-23 18:35 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-10-23 18:44 ` Mark Knecht
2006-10-23 18:59 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-10-23 20:09 ` Mark Knecht
2006-10-23 18:49 ` Lee Revell
2006-10-23 18:58 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-10-23 20:26 ` Sergio Monteiro Basto
2006-10-23 20:40 ` Lee Revell [this message]
2006-10-24 1:26 ` -rt7 announcement? (was Re: 2.6.18-rt6) and more info about a compile error Sergio Monteiro Basto
2006-10-24 4:38 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-10-24 16:48 ` Daniel Walker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1161636049.3982.18.camel@mindpipe \
--to=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=bastien.dugue@bull.net \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dwalker@mvista.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mlachwani@mvista.com \
--cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
--cc=sergio@sergiomb.no-ip.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.