From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Berg Subject: Re: wireless notes / pre d80211 merge Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 11:16:44 +0100 Message-ID: <1163585804.2705.44.camel@ux156> References: <1163542797.5399.106.camel@johannes.berg> <20061115011123.0eb1eff6@logostar.upir.cz> <1163582178.2705.16.camel@ux156> <20061115110549.2fa3866c@griffin.suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev , Jeff Garzik , "John W. Linville" , Simon Barber , Michael Buesch , Ivo van Doorn , Michael Wu , Jouni Malinen , Daniel Drake , Hong Liu , "Luis R. Rodriguez" , James Ketrenos , David Kimdon , Udayan Singh Return-path: Received: from crystal.sipsolutions.net ([195.210.38.204]:5772 "EHLO sipsolutions.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966738AbWKOKPf (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Nov 2006 05:15:35 -0500 To: Jiri Benc In-Reply-To: <20061115110549.2fa3866c@griffin.suse.cz> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 11:05 +0100, Jiri Benc wrote: > I wasn't in times when there was no cfg80211. But now... yes, you're > right. The sysfs ieee80211 class exports just some interesting > informations (we already agreed that add_interface and remove_interface > would go away). Feel free to move it wherever you think is appropriate. Even with cfg80211 we have the wiphy concept embedded in there. Not much difference because we still have to do tc on wmasterN and "wiconf" on wiphyN. So that doesn't really change anything. Now, we could of course drop the wiphy concept from cfg80211 easily and require doing all these things on wmasterN. That's the option I considered in section (8). I don't like it too much, but I think I could live with it. johannes