From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christophe Varoqui Subject: RE: patch to discovery.c to still getpathpriorityforpaths with path state of PATH_DOWN Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 23:58:15 +0100 Message-ID: <1163631495.10466.147.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <6CCEAEDF4D06984A83F427424F47D6E4013D1554@CORPUSMX40A.corp.emc.com> Reply-To: device-mapper development Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <6CCEAEDF4D06984A83F427424F47D6E4013D1554@CORPUSMX40A.corp.emc.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com To: Edward Goggin Cc: dm-devel@redhat.com, dave.wysochanski@redhat.com List-Id: dm-devel.ids Le mercredi 15 novembre 2006 =C3=A0 17:48 -0500, Edward Goggin a =C3=A9cr= it : > OK. I was trying not to have to introduce another > prio state because that approach just seems prone > to error. >=20 Actually, the patch remove one (0) :) > I'll give it a try tomorrow. >=20 Thanks.