From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Andrew D. Ball" Subject: Re: about xen devices Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 18:00:00 -0500 Message-ID: <1165532400.5568.18.camel@localhost> References: <4575C3FB.4000802@freemail.gr> Reply-To: aball@linux.vnet.ibm.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4575C3FB.4000802@freemail.gr> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Constantine Kousoulos Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org The latter option -- new drivers, unless you're mapping devices to guests giving the illusion that the guest has complete controlled over the mapped devices (pci pass-through, iommu, etc.). Peace. Andrew On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 21:09 +0200, Constantine Kousoulos wrote: > Hello all, > > I am a bit confused about the use of backend drivers by guest os'es. > > A guest os must modify/port it's drivers so that they can > communicate with the backend drivers? Or a guest os stops using > its own native drivers and just communicates with the backend > drivers through newly implemented frontend drivers? > > I hope you can clear that up for me. > > Thanks, > Constantine > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel