From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [194.106.48.114] (helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H0oEC-0007ER-CL for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Sun, 31 Dec 2006 01:07:04 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kBV06Fef011352 for ; Sun, 31 Dec 2006 00:06:15 GMT Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 10921-07 for ; Sun, 31 Dec 2006 00:06:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from max.rpnet.com (max.rpnet.com [192.168.1.15]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kBV068dM011345 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 31 Dec 2006 00:06:08 GMT From: Richard Purdie To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org In-Reply-To: <20061230235938.GC16490@hezmatt.org> References: <20061230051641.GA30225@hezmatt.org> <1167506369.5626.46.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20061230214326.GE15188@hezmatt.org> <4596E33D.306@dominion.kabel.utwente.nl> <20061230235938.GC16490@hezmatt.org> Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 00:06:10 +0000 Message-Id: <1167523571.5626.59.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Subject: Re: A question of workflow X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 00:07:04 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sun, 2006-12-31 at 10:59 +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote: > Note also that Richard said that I shouldn't be doing *any* commits locally > -- no mention of branching or any other way to take advantage of the > benefits of a DRCS. (Not having a go at you, Richard, just explaining my > thought processes.) This is simply because we have no established way of receiving data through the SCM for merging into trunk without direct write access. As my other email says, I'd like to find a way of supporting that but its probably an education issue on both sides. Richard