From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [66.249.82.227] (helo=wx-out-0506.google.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from ) id 1GY3lU-0000HA-Au for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 18:50:38 +0200 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s19so615966wxc for ; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 09:44:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.33.10 with SMTP id g10mr3269363wxg; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 09:44:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from CUBE ( [85.202.124.214]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 22sm1123298nzn.2006.10.12.09.44.10; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 09:44:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 19:44:08 +0300 From: Paul Sokolovsky X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1167982954.20061012194408@gmail.com> To: Koen Kooi In-Reply-To: <452E0947.4070605@dominion.kabel.utwente.nl> References: <452E0947.4070605@dominion.kabel.utwente.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Linux Distributions Subject: Re: [Openembedded-announce] kernel maintainers: COMPATIBLE_MACHINE field will become mandatory X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8 Precedence: list Reply-To: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Linux Distributions List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Linux Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 16:50:41 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Koen, Thursday, October 12, 2006, 12:22:15 PM, you wrote: [] > Hi, > At the OEDEM conference we decided that the COMPATIBLE_MACHINE field will be mandatory for > kernel recipes. If you maintain a kernel recipe: add the appropriate COMPATIBLE_MACHINE > field. If you don't maintain a kernel recipe, but want to help: patches welcome. > The COMPATIBLE_MACHINE machine field tells bitbake for which machines this is a valid > kernel to avoid surprises for some reason the > PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel gets broken. > A lot of kernels already have that field, so have a look at first if you any questions. Just a question - should there be already machine conf file in OE for anything added to COMPATIBLE_MACHINE, or can something be added as an informative, "for-future", annotation? > regards, > Koen -- Best regards, Paul mailto:pmiscml@gmail.com