From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix sparsemem on Cell (take 3) From: John Rose To: Dave Hansen In-Reply-To: <1168045803.8945.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20061215165335.61D9F775@localhost.localdomain> <200612182354.47685.arnd@arndb.de> <1166483780.8648.26.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200612190959.47344.arnd@arndb.de> <1168045803.8945.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1168059162.23226.1.camel@sinatra.austin.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 22:52:42 -0600 Cc: Andrew Morton , mkravetz@us.ibm.com, Arnd Bergmann , linux-mm@kvack.org, lkml , hch@infradead.org, External List , Paul Mackerras , kmannth@us.ibm.com, gone@us.ibm.com, cbe-oss-dev@ozlabs.org, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > I dropped this on the floor over Christmas. This has had a few smoke > tests on ppc64 and i386 and is ready for -mm. Against 2.6.20-rc2-mm1. Could this break ia64, given that it uses memmap_init_zone()? From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751177AbXAFExc (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jan 2007 23:53:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751128AbXAFExb (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jan 2007 23:53:31 -0500 Received: from e31.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.149]:42449 "EHLO e31.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751177AbXAFExa (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jan 2007 23:53:30 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix sparsemem on Cell (take 3) From: John Rose To: Dave Hansen Cc: Andrew Morton , External List , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , kmannth@us.ibm.com, lkml , hch@infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Paul Mackerras , mkravetz@us.ibm.com, gone@us.ibm.com, cbe-oss-dev@ozlabs.org, Arnd Bergmann In-Reply-To: <1168045803.8945.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20061215165335.61D9F775@localhost.localdomain> <200612182354.47685.arnd@arndb.de> <1166483780.8648.26.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200612190959.47344.arnd@arndb.de> <1168045803.8945.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1168059162.23226.1.camel@sinatra.austin.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 22:52:42 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I dropped this on the floor over Christmas. This has had a few smoke > tests on ppc64 and i386 and is ready for -mm. Against 2.6.20-rc2-mm1. Could this break ia64, given that it uses memmap_init_zone()? From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.11]) by e36.co.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l064rTxk027935 for ; Fri, 5 Jan 2007 23:53:29 -0500 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (d03av01.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.167]) by westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/NCO v8.1.1) with ESMTP id l064rRE2483572 for ; Fri, 5 Jan 2007 21:53:29 -0700 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l064rQAD028286 for ; Fri, 5 Jan 2007 21:53:27 -0700 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix sparsemem on Cell (take 3) From: John Rose In-Reply-To: <1168045803.8945.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20061215165335.61D9F775@localhost.localdomain> <200612182354.47685.arnd@arndb.de> <1166483780.8648.26.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200612190959.47344.arnd@arndb.de> <1168045803.8945.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1168059162.23226.1.camel@sinatra.austin.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 22:52:42 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Dave Hansen Cc: Andrew Morton , External List , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , kmannth@us.ibm.com, lkml , hch@infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Paul Mackerras , mkravetz@us.ibm.com, gone@us.ibm.com, cbe-oss-dev@ozlabs.org, Arnd Bergmann List-ID: > I dropped this on the floor over Christmas. This has had a few smoke > tests on ppc64 and i386 and is ready for -mm. Against 2.6.20-rc2-mm1. Could this break ia64, given that it uses memmap_init_zone()? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org