From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: What is ANAND header? From: David Woodhouse To: dedekind@infradead.org In-Reply-To: <1169716358.3609.12.camel@sauron> References: <20070124054731.GA31267@pooky.senux.com> <20070125064937.GA5712@pooky.senux.com> <1169716358.3609.12.camel@sauron> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 23:30:58 +0800 Message-Id: <1169739059.3593.84.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Seongsu Lee List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2007-01-25 at 20:12 +1100, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > On Thu, 2007-01-25 at 15:49 +0900, Seongsu Lee wrote: > > Then, is there any technical reason that translation layer > > for bare NAND flash memory is *not* exist? > > Just because it is a damn difficult task. No it isn't. It's just not an _interesting_ task. A 'normal' file system on top of a translation layer is always going to be suboptimal when compared to a file system designed to run directly on flash. -- dwmw2