From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Galbraith Subject: Re: 2.6.20-rc6: known unfixed regressions (v2) (part 2) Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 05:14:00 +0100 Message-ID: <1170130440.6679.9.camel@Homer.simpson.net> References: <20070127174230.GN6017@stusta.de> <20070128133344.214070@gmx.net> <1170051963.6454.7.camel@Homer.simpson.net> <1170064904.6322.3.camel@Homer.simpson.net> <1170094599.6691.12.camel@Homer.simpson.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:55499 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S965127AbXA3EOD (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jan 2007 23:14:03 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Uwe Bugla , Adrian Bunk , Andrew Morton , gd@spherenet.de, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl, Jeff Garzik , Jens Axboe , Mike Christie , James Bottomley On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 10:43 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > > The extremely unlikely winner is: > > > > 29b08d2bae854f66d3cfd5f57aaf2e7c2c7fce32 is first bad commit > > Yeah, that's not going to be it. You probably had a bad kernel there > somewhere that you called "good". Oh well, all was not wasted. I'm now gitified (the clone wasn't nearly as bad as I thought it was going to be with my lousy connection). Now I need another repeatable bug to try it against. -Mike