All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Edward Goggin <egoggin@vmware.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, eric.moore@lsi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] : definion, code, and use of new SCSI ML host status DID_COND_REQUEUE
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 18:33:38 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1170459219.14264.91.camel@egoggin-devd.eng.vmware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1170458287.3380.39.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com>

On Fri, 2007-02-02 at 17:18 -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-02-02 at 18:11 -0500, Edward Goggin wrote:
> > That solution doesn't work for the RDAC/MPP driver as the BUSY status
> > handler retries indefinitely.  We need a solution which works for both a
> > bare metal host running RDAC/MPP which for this use case, wants to get
> > control over the failed command ASAP and a VMware host which may need to
> > retry longer than DID_BUS_BUSY currently allows for.
> 
> No it doesn't, not any longer... the mid-layer retries for the command
> up to its timeout before failing.  That's the point about questioning
> the validity of the original problem.
> 
> James
> 
> 

I think I see your argument ... retries for BUSY and all other scsi/host
status's are limited by the code in scsi_softirq_done which filters the
disposition returned by scsi_decide_disposition, so no status will yield
an indefinite retry.

Not clear if that's soon enough for RDAC/MPP.  For the VMware case, it
appears to allow an additional 30 seconds (beyond what DID_BUSY_BUSY
would allow) for a retry. 


      reply	other threads:[~2007-02-02 23:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-02-02 22:04 [PATCH 0/2] : definion, code, and use of new SCSI ML host status DID_COND_REQUEUE Edward Goggin
2007-02-02 22:54 ` James Bottomley
2007-02-02 23:11   ` Edward Goggin
2007-02-02 23:18     ` James Bottomley
2007-02-02 23:33       ` Edward Goggin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1170459219.14264.91.camel@egoggin-devd.eng.vmware.com \
    --to=egoggin@vmware.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
    --cc=eric.moore@lsi.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.