From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: v2.6.20-rt1, yum/rpm Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2007 11:42:33 +0100 Message-ID: <1170672153.4672.1.camel@twins> References: <20070205065636.GA1652@elte.hu> <8355959a0702050236k14aa8c98g29fdbac2c1370def@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org To: Sunil Naidu Return-path: Received: from amsfep17-int.chello.nl ([213.46.243.15]:28037 "EHLO amsfep13-int.chello.nl" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751460AbXBEKqy (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Feb 2007 05:46:54 -0500 In-Reply-To: <8355959a0702050236k14aa8c98g29fdbac2c1370def@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 16:06 +0530, Sunil Naidu wrote: > On 2/5/07, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > i have released the v2.6.20-rt1 kernel, which can be downloaded from the > > usual place: > > Clean boot for me with 2.6.20 & 2.6.20-rt1. There isn't any error > (like in 2.6.20-rc7-rt3). > > But here is an interesting dmesg: > > rcu_boost_dat: idx=1 b=0 ul=0 ub=0 boost: a=0 b=0 > rcu_boost_dat block: 0 0 0 0? > rcu_boost_dat boost: 0! 0 0 0? > rcu_boost_dat unlock: 0? 0 0 0? > > I didn'tunderstand this with ? Am I missing anything here or please > give some inputs. That is Paul McKenney's RCU priority boosting stuff. Look here: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/1/24/294