From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Philippe Gerum <rpm@xenomai.org>
In-Reply-To: <45CAEB8C.40000@domain.hid>
References: <45CAE190.6020404@domain.hid> <1170926285.20614.7.camel@domain.hid>
	<45CAEB8C.40000@domain.hid>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 10:30:40 +0100
Message-Id: <1170927041.20614.9.camel@domain.hid>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: Philippe Gerum <philippe.gerum@domain.hid>
Subject: [Xenomai-core] Re: Fixed two timer base regressions
Reply-To: rpm@xenomai.org
List-Id: "Xenomai life and development \(bug reports, patches,
	discussions\)" <xenomai.xenomai.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core>,
	<mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
List-Archive: </public/xenomai-core>
List-Post: <mailto:xenomai@xenomai.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
List-Subscribe: <https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core>,
	<mailto:xenomai-core-request@domain.hid>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@domain.hid>
Cc: xenomai-core <xenomai@xenomai.org>

On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 10:21 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Philippe Gerum wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 09:38 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> Hi Philippe,
> >>
> >> the "trivial" bugs are fixed already: see #2152 for the reason why
> >> rt_dev_read timeouts took too long (the timer mode was ignored by
> >> xnsynch_sleep_on),
> > 
> > Ok.
> > 
> >>  and I also found a yet invisible bug in
> >> rtdm_toseq_init that would have picked the wrong time base (#2153).
> >>
> > 
> > Using xnpod_current_thread()'s time base in rtdm_toseq_init() will
> > always pick the master one when called over a secondary mode context,
> > which according to the doc, is allowed. Is this intended?
> 
> rtdm_toseq_init will only be called over primary context, it belongs
> into the same context as rtdm_mutex_timedlock, rtdm_sem_timeddown, etc.
> 

So the doc needs fixing, I guess.

-- 
Philippe.