From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E898DDD01 for ; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 11:27:38 +1100 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] spidernet: support for Celleb From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Linas Vepstas In-Reply-To: <20070212234959.GF923@austin.ibm.com> References: <200702070849.l178nvGC005341@toshiba.co.jp> <20070212234959.GF923@austin.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 11:24:10 +1100 Message-Id: <1171326250.20192.48.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, jgarzik@pobox.com, jim@jklewis.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 17:49 -0600, Linas Vepstas wrote: > On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 05:49:50PM +0900, Ishizaki Kou wrote: > > This is a revised spidernet patch set based on > > netdev-2.6.git#upstream. > > Tested this series of patches together with Jen's "version 3" patch, > it worked for me. Code looks reasonable. Thus > > Acked-by: Linas Vepstas > > I'm somewhat unclear as to whethr I should be doing > > Signed-off-by: Linas Vepstas If the patch wasn't actually handled and passed-on by you or modified by you, then no. Acked-by is the way to go. Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt too while at it. Ben.