From: Rodney Gordon II <meff@pobox.com>
To: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
Cc: "mdew ." <some.nzguy@gmail.com>,
ck@vds.kolivas.org,
linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ck] Re: 2.6.20-ck1
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 00:15:57 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1171779357.4740.5.camel@ghreen.sphere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cone.1171766339.618918.14587.501@kolivas.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1018 bytes --]
On Sun, 2007-02-18 at 13:38 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
> mdew . writes:
>
> > On 2/16/07, Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org> wrote:
> >> This patchset is designed to improve system responsiveness and interactivity.
> >> It is configurable to any workload but the default -ck patch is aimed at the
> >> desktop and -cks is available with more emphasis on serverspace.
> >>
> >> Apply to 2.6.20
> >
> > any benchmarks for 2.6.20-ck vs 2.6.20?
>
> Would some -ck user on the mailing list like to perform a set of interbench
> benchmarks? They're pretty straight forward to do; see:
>
> http://interbench.kolivas.org
>
> --
> -ck
Here are some benches comparing 2.6.18-4-686 (Debian sid stock) and
2.6.20-ck1-mt1 (2.6.20-ck1 + sched-idleprio-1.11-2.0.patch)
I know it's not what was asked for, but it might be useful for review of
anyone using Debian kernels considering ck patches :)
Take a look.
-r
--
Rodney "meff" Gordon II -*- meff@pobox.com
Systems Administrator / Coder Geek -*- Open yourself to OpenSource
[-- Attachment #2: 2.6.18-4-686.log --]
[-- Type: text/x-log, Size: 2170 bytes --]
Using 1816966 loops per ms, running every load for 30 seconds
Benchmarking kernel 2.6.18-4-686 at datestamp 200702172244
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Audio in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU % Deadlines Met
None 0.005 +/- 0.00545 0.008 100 100
Video 0.086 +/- 0.661 6.7 100 100
X 0.03 +/- 0.272 5.32 100 100
Burn 0.005 +/- 0.00565 0.01 100 100
Write 0.043 +/- 0.281 5.28 100 100
Read 0.01 +/- 0.0293 0.537 100 100
Compile 0.013 +/- 0.119 2.91 100 100
Memload 0.033 +/- 0.289 6.2 100 100
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Video in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU % Deadlines Met
None 0.024 +/- 0.556 16.7 100 99.9
X 0.874 +/- 3.78 16.7 100 94.9
Burn 0.005 +/- 0.00559 0.008 100 100
Write 0.128 +/- 1.36 24.6 100 99.6
Read 0.524 +/- 2.93 16.7 100 96.9
Compile 0.136 +/- 1.43 17.3 100 99.3
Memload 0.751 +/- 3.48 17.3 100 95.7
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of X in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU % Deadlines Met
None 0.293 +/- 1.34 10 92.3 89.2
Video 0.606 +/- 2.32 18 89.8 84.6
Burn 0.526 +/- 1.93 10 90.6 85.1
Write 1.35 +/- 7.79 92 87.4 84
Read 2.3 +/- 7.4 44 78.8 72
Compile 2.09 +/- 7.75 72 78.5 72.9
Memload 0.767 +/- 2.82 24 87.5 82.2
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Gaming in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU
None 2.64 +/- 9.31 50.6 97.4
Video 0.063 +/- 0.297 5.07 99.9
X 0.061 +/- 0.377 6.48 99.9
Burn 183 +/- 194 400 35.3
Write 1.32 +/- 6.21 80.9 98.7
Read 4.98 +/- 7 34.5 95.3
Compile 210 +/- 228 449 32.3
Memload 4.57 +/- 11.2 83 95.6
[-- Attachment #3: 2.6.20-ck1-mt1.log --]
[-- Type: text/x-log, Size: 2172 bytes --]
Using 1816966 loops per ms, running every load for 30 seconds
Benchmarking kernel 2.6.20-ck1-mt1 at datestamp 200702172307
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Audio in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU % Deadlines Met
None 0.005 +/- 0.00517 0.009 100 100
Video 0.016 +/- 0.017 0.022 100 100
X 0.018 +/- 0.13 3.17 100 100
Burn 0.005 +/- 0.00551 0.013 100 100
Write 0.016 +/- 0.0489 1.07 100 100
Read 0.016 +/- 0.102 2.48 100 100
Compile 0.051 +/- 0.421 7 100 100
Memload 0.012 +/- 0.08 1.55 100 100
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Video in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU % Deadlines Met
None 0.088 +/- 1.18 16.7 100 99.5
X 0.014 +/- 0.0153 0.026 100 100
Burn 0.005 +/- 0.00553 0.016 100 100
Write 0.057 +/- 0.734 16.7 100 99.8
Read 0.016 +/- 0.0187 0.21 100 100
Compile 0.042 +/- 0.328 5.59 100 100
Memload 0.014 +/- 0.0883 1.93 100 100
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of X in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU % Deadlines Met
None 0.033 +/- 0.258 2 98.7 97.7
Video 0.033 +/- 0.258 2 98.7 97.7
Burn 0.046 +/- 0.337 3 98.4 97
Write 0.129 +/- 0.777 7 96.5 94.4
Read 0.292 +/- 1.75 18 94.4 91.6
Compile 0.473 +/- 2.66 28 92 89
Memload 0.178 +/- 0.98 8 96.8 93.8
--- Benchmarking simulated cpu of Gaming in the presence of simulated ---
Load Latency +/- SD (ms) Max Latency % Desired CPU
None 0.124 +/- 0.126 0.369 99.9
Video 0.439 +/- 0.44 0.459 99.6
X 0.444 +/- 0.469 2.98 99.6
Burn 198 +/- 236 280 33.6
Write 0.509 +/- 0.752 7.59 99.5
Read 2.02 +/- 4.93 31.8 98
Compile 201 +/- 239 299 33.2
Memload 3.39 +/- 5.18 31.3 96.7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-18 6:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-16 10:10 2.6.20-ck1 Con Kolivas
2007-02-16 15:47 ` 2.6.20-ck1 Malte Schröder
2007-02-16 21:35 ` 2.6.20-ck1 Edouard Gomez
2007-02-16 21:45 ` 2.6.20-ck1 Edouard Gomez
2007-02-17 0:53 ` 2.6.20-ck1 Chuck Ebbert
2007-02-17 1:13 ` 2.6.20-ck1 Con Kolivas
2007-02-17 2:15 ` [ck] 2.6.20-ck1 michael chang
2007-02-17 3:17 ` Con Kolivas
2007-02-17 17:28 ` michael chang
2007-02-17 18:45 ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-02-17 21:00 ` Con Kolivas
2007-02-17 21:50 ` michael chang
2007-02-17 23:47 ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-18 0:39 ` 2.6.20-ck1 Con Kolivas
2007-02-18 0:41 ` [ck] 2.6.20-ck1 Radoslaw Szkodzinski
2007-02-18 0:45 ` 2.6.20-ck1 Con Kolivas
2007-02-17 11:15 ` 2.6.20-ck1 Hugo Vanwoerkom
2007-02-18 2:14 ` 2.6.20-ck1 mdew .
2007-02-18 2:38 ` 2.6.20-ck1 Con Kolivas
2007-02-18 6:05 ` [ck] 2.6.20-ck1 Con Kolivas
2007-02-18 6:15 ` Rodney Gordon II [this message]
2007-02-18 6:20 ` Rodney Gordon II
2007-02-18 16:54 ` 2.6.20-ck1 Ryan M.
2007-02-18 19:00 ` [ck] 2.6.20-ck1 Ash Milsted
2007-02-24 12:12 ` 2.6.20-ck1 Fabio Comolli
2007-02-25 4:34 ` 2.6.20-ck1 Gene Heskett
2007-02-25 10:32 ` 2.6.20-ck1 Con Kolivas
2007-02-25 16:33 ` 2.6.20-ck1 Gene Heskett
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1171779357.4740.5.camel@ghreen.sphere \
--to=meff@pobox.com \
--cc=ck@vds.kolivas.org \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=some.nzguy@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.