From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Introduce address space "slices" From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Jimi Xenidis In-Reply-To: <934E7F45-153D-4558-A774-FA5B6AB69E3C@watson.ibm.com> References: <1171867418.18571.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> <934E7F45-153D-4558-A774-FA5B6AB69E3C@watson.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 06:42:37 +1100 Message-Id: <1171914157.18571.38.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: linuxppc-dev list , "cbe-oss-dev@ozlabs.org" , "Hollis R. Blanchard" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 2007-02-19 at 08:23 -0500, Jimi Xenidis wrote: > Hey Ben, > is it your intention to eventually support "/memory@x/ > ibm,expected#pages" and will these rules effect the kernel's linear map? > My interest is with hypervisors that would like to restrict certain > LMBs to 4k so we can do our nasty memory tricks, but still have most > of the memory use large pages. The slices mecanism is strictly a mecanism for dealing with segment constraints on userland VMA layout, so I don't think it will have any impact either negative or positive on you. Limiting physical memory to different page sizes is a whole different problem that I haven't though about (damn, that would be hard). Ben.