From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: hypercall execution path? Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 20:05:31 +0000 Message-ID: <1172174731.19233.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <45DDD02E.40007@thepaynes.cc> <1172168208.12407.26.camel@lapbode42.lrr.in.tum.de> <1172168289.12407.28.camel@lapbode42.lrr.in.tum.de> <45DDE128.1040106@thepaynes.cc> <1172169424.20968.54.camel@localhost.localdomain> <45DDEAD5.1010703@thepaynes.cc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <45DDEAD5.1010703@thepaynes.cc> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: "Bryan D. Payne" Cc: Xen Developers List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 14:11 -0500, Bryan D. Payne wrote: > > Are you sure you are looking at the correct vcpu? > > There is only one vcpu assigned to this domain. Based on this, I'm > assuming that my code (shown below) is correct. > > > > How are you looking at the EIP register? > > uint32_t eip = domain->vcpu[0]->arch.guest_context.user_regs.eip; That seems reasonable. Where have you put this tracing? How you are arranging for the hypercall you are expecting to be called and how you are matching that up with where your tracing is placed? Perhaps you could post your code so we can see what you are actually doing? Ian.