From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932331AbXCHGKQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Mar 2007 01:10:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932353AbXCHGKQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Mar 2007 01:10:16 -0500 Received: from e34.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.152]:58216 "EHLO e34.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932331AbXCHGKN (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Mar 2007 01:10:13 -0500 Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 0/2] resource control file system - aka containers on top of nsproxy! From: Matt Helsley To: Sam Vilain Cc: Paul Menage , Srivatsa Vaddagiri , ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, xemul@sw.ru, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pj@sgi.com, "Eric W. Biederman" , winget@google.com, containers@lists.osdl.org, "Serge E. Hallyn" , akpm@linux-foundation.org, dev@sw.ru In-Reply-To: <45EF83CB.9080903@vilain.net> References: <20070301133543.GK15509@in.ibm.com> <20070307205846.GB7010@sergelap.austin.ibm.com> <6599ad830703071320ib687019h34d2e66c4abc3794@mail.gmail.com> <6599ad830703071518y715ecdb2y33752a6e25b5ecdb@mail.gmail.com> <45EF5A62.8000103@vilain.net> <6599ad830703071642n69bbd801n6114fa6f9e60a168@mail.gmail.com> <45EF5E71.7090101@vilain.net> <6599ad830703071658q60466dd8hd18a1eab9bc17535@mail.gmail.com> <45EF793C.1000700@vilain.net> <6599ad830703071857yf711921ja3440c4276bbe58e@mail.gmail.com> <45EF83CB.9080903@vilain.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-7 Organization: IBM Linux Technology Center Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:10:09 -0800 Message-Id: <1173334209.13172.61.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 16:32 +-1300, Sam Vilain wrote: +ADw-snip+AD4 +AD4 Kirill, 06032418:36+-03: +AD4 +AD4 I propose to use +ACI-namespace+ACI naming. +AD4 +AD4 1. This is already used in fs. +AD4 +AD4 2. This is what IMHO suites at least OpenVZ/Eric +AD4 +AD4 3. it has good acronym +ACI-ns+ACI. +AD4 +AD4 Right. So, now I'll also throw into the mix: +AD4 +AD4 - resource groups (I get a strange feeling of d+AOk-j+AOA v+APo there) +ADw-offtopic+AD4 Re: d+AOk-j+AOA v+APo: yes+ACE It's like that Star Trek episode ... except we can't agree on the name of the impossible particle we will invent which solves all our problems. +ADw-/offtopic+AD4 At the risk of prolonging the agony I hate to ask: are all of these groupings really concerned with +ACI-resources+ACI? +AD4 - supply chains (think supply and demand) +AD4 - accounting classes CKRM's use of the term +ACI-class+ACI drew negative comments from Paul Jackson and Andrew Morton about this time last year. That led to my suggestion of +ACI-Resource Groups+ACI. Unless they've changed their minds... +AD4 Do any of those sound remotely close? If not, your turn :) I'll butt in here: task groups? task sets? confuselets? +ADs) Cheers, -Matt Helsley