Re: Bitbake Request for Testing of bitbake 1.8

[Richard Purdie <rpurdie@rpsys.net>]

On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 10:33 +0100, Christopher Lang wrote:
> This is the output without -v without the 'GLIBC_ADDONS = "nptl"'. The "triple 
> glibc" note does not show.
> 
> http://pastebin.ca/387372
> 
> 
> This one is the original output (without the 'GLIBC_ADDONS = "nptl"') but with 
> -v. Only there you can see the line:
> NOTE: multiple preferred providers are available for runtime libsegfault 
> (glibc, glibc, glibc);
> 
> http://pastebin.ca/387374
> 
> I thought that multiple identical PREFERRED_PROVIDERS might indicate an issue. 

That just looks like the new logic in bitbake working as expected (it
examined all possible libc providers of which there were probably 3,
each one gave a messge). Yes, the output could be more friendly/readable
but that is an on going problem to be revisited during the UI overhaul. 

Bitbake 1.6 would do something similar if it had tried to build all 3
glibc providers.

Cheers,

Richard