From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Tom 'spot' Callaway" Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 21:38:03 +0000 Subject: Re: sparc32 esp connected CDROM failures Message-Id: <1174081083.3628.51.camel@localhost.localdomain> List-Id: References: <1173976389.16911.13.camel@dhcp-32-109.ord.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1173976389.16911.13.camel@dhcp-32-109.ord.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 16:32 -0500, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote: > On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 13:52 -0700, David Miller wrote: > > From: "Tom 'spot' Callaway" > > Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:47:00 -0500 > > > > > The ioctl error repeats once more in the sequence...but the CDROM seems > > > to work ok, as compared to sparc32, where it refuses to work. > > > > Unfortunately that puts the ball in your or someone else's court, > > since I don't have any sparc32 systems and therefore any way to work > > on sparc32 bugs. > > Well, it looks like I spoke too soon. CD1 worked, but CD2 gave me these > errors when I tried to read it: > > attempt to access beyond end of device > sr0: rw=0, want05604, limit68440 > attempt to access beyond end of device > sr0: rw=0, want05608, limit68440 > attempt to access beyond end of device > sr0: rw=0, want05612, limit68440 > attempt to access beyond end of device > sr0: rw=0, want05616, limit68440 > > Confirmed that the image and the CD is good (it reads fine in several > other machines). > > CD1 was slightly smaller, perhaps thats why it slipped by? CD1 has 619M of data on it. CD2 has 638M of data on it. ~spot