From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752860AbXCUODS (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Mar 2007 10:03:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752862AbXCUODS (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Mar 2007 10:03:18 -0400 Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([131.228.20.172]:23054 "EHLO mgw-ext13.nokia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752860AbXCUODR convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Mar 2007 10:03:17 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/22 take 3] UBI: Unsorted Block Images From: Artem Bityutskiy Reply-To: dedekind@infradead.org To: Theodore Tso Cc: Josh Boyer , Matt Mackall , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Frank Haverkamp , Christoph Hellwig , David Woodhouse In-Reply-To: <20070321135033.GA7235@thunk.org> References: <20070319170838.GP4892@waste.org> <1174328188.30079.46.camel@zod.rchland.ibm.com> <20070319195442.GT4892@waste.org> <1174338393.17249.53.camel@sauron> <20070319213628.GW4892@waste.org> <1174393549.17249.101.camel@sauron> <20070320135231.GA6043@thunk.org> <1174406395.30079.139.camel@zod.rchland.ibm.com> <20070320220312.GC29493@thunk.org> <1174466675.17249.182.camel@sauron> <20070321135033.GA7235@thunk.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 16:02:35 +0200 Message-Id: <1174485755.17249.206.camel@sauron> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.3 (2.8.3-1.fc6) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Mar 2007 14:02:35.0365 (UTC) FILETIME=[93AAC150:01C76BC1] X-Nokia-AV: Clean Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 09:50 -0400, Theodore Tso wrote: > And at this point, I don't doubt that you will at some point going to > heed my comments --- but note that doing so will involve a massive > refactorization of the code, which will tend to invalidate the reviews > done of this current (take 3) version of the patches; so I am bit > curious what was your motiviation in reposting this round of the > patches. Well, in take 3 I _already_ removed quite _a lot_ of itsy-bitsy units, and I thought it is enough, so I've submitted it. But later I've realized that I should go further (e.g., dispose of per-unit data structures), and started more re-work. Yes, I should have notified about this new re-work, apologies. Point taken, will be fixed :-) -- Best regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)