From: "Wu, Bryan" <bryan.wu@analog.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Wu@analog.com, Bryan <bryan.wu@analog.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
bert hubert <bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 1/4] Blackfin: architecture update patch
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 10:24:51 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1174530291.20061.9.camel@roc-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070321155324.a7d2d75a.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 15:53 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 18:19:23 +0800
> "Wu, Bryan" <bryan.wu@analog.com> wrote:
>
> > 1) Some issues are fixed according to LKML patch review.
> > 2) Remove not supported BF535 code
> > 3) Fixed some bugs from blackfin.uclinux.org SVN update
> > Here is the updated patch for 2.6.21-rc4-mm1
>
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/asm-blackfin/cplbinit.h.rej
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/asm-blackfin/mach-bf535/bf535.h.rej
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/asm-blackfin/scatterlist.h.rej
>
> This seems to be against a kernel which did not include
> blackfin-arch-balance-parenthesis-in-macros.patch. But 2.6.21-rc4-mm1 did
> include blackfin-arch-balance-parenthesis-in-macros.patch, so I'm not sure
> what is going on here.
>
Sorry for this mess up. you know, as
blackfin-arch-balance-parenthesis-in-macros.patch was posted, it was
applied to our SVN tree. And I just merged these weeks SVN change to
this update patch. So this patch includes
blackfin-arch-balance-parenthesis-in-macros.patch.
Please hold on, after I fixed some issues according to Arnd and Paul's
latest review, a new update patch will be sent.
Sorry for send a all-in-one update patch. Arnd and Paul gave lots' of
good ideas about our last blackfin-arch.patch last time, and most of
their request are applied in this days. So if I split the all-in-one
update patch to small fix, there will be maybe 20 or 30 patches.
After this blackfin-arch-update.patch was merged to -mm, I will post
small fixed patches as Arnd's advise.
Thanks
-Bryan Wu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-22 2:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1174472363.5648.58.camel@roc-desktop>
2007-03-21 22:53 ` [PATCH -mm 1/4] Blackfin: architecture update patch Andrew Morton
2007-03-22 2:24 ` Wu, Bryan [this message]
2007-03-22 4:08 ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-22 5:47 ` Wu, Bryan
[not found] <1174471618.5648.50.camel@roc-desktop>
2007-03-21 10:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-03-21 10:33 ` Wu, Bryan
2007-03-21 10:38 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-03-21 12:56 ` Paul Mundt
2007-03-21 15:39 ` Mike Frysinger
2007-03-21 13:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1174530291.20061.9.camel@roc-desktop \
--to=bryan.wu@analog.com \
--cc=Wu@analog.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bert.hubert@netherlabs.nl \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.