From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2992572AbXDEMKS (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Apr 2007 08:10:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S2992577AbXDEMKS (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Apr 2007 08:10:18 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:35332 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S2992572AbXDEMKQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Apr 2007 08:10:16 -0400 X-Authenticated: #14349625 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18ZH44rvX0Za+F/jOzvvplCYUo/wpfoIfpQz2p5MM ffESe7JarLQZV7 Subject: Re: [test] sched: SD-latest versus Mike's latest From: Mike Galbraith To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Con Kolivas , linux list , Andrew Morton , ck list In-Reply-To: <20070405115447.GA24138@elte.hu> References: <200703290237.38777.kernel@kolivas.org> <200703290944.45888.kernel@kolivas.org> <1175147455.6430.91.camel@Homer.simpson.net> <200704031237.21946.kernel@kolivas.org> <1175578270.6342.12.camel@Homer.simpson.net> <20070403060109.GA6708@elte.hu> <1175770950.6609.16.camel@Homer.simpson.net> <20070405115447.GA24138@elte.hu> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 14:10:12 +0200 Message-Id: <1175775012.6609.31.camel@Homer.simpson.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 13:54 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > here's some test results, comparing SD-latest to Mike's-latest: > > re-testing the weak points of the vanilla scheduler + Mike's: > > - thud.c: this workload has almost unnoticeable effect > - fiftyp.c: noticeable, but alot better than previously! Hmm. Here fiftyp.c is utterly harmless. If you have a second, can you send me a top snapshot? If you're running many of them, it can take a bit for the throttle to catch them all. -Mike