From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [194.106.48.114] (helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Haa1e-0007Nn-BH for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Sun, 08 Apr 2007 18:13:58 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l38GDv1J019630 for ; Sun, 8 Apr 2007 17:13:57 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 19513-01 for ; Sun, 8 Apr 2007 17:13:55 +0100 (BST) Received: from max.rpnet.com (max.rpnet.com [192.168.1.15]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l38GDqHT019621 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 8 Apr 2007 17:13:52 +0100 From: Richard Purdie To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org In-Reply-To: <46176E51.2030608@dominion.kabel.utwente.nl> References: <46176E51.2030608@dominion.kabel.utwente.nl> Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2007 17:13:52 +0100 Message-Id: <1176048832.5844.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Subject: Re: [RFC] rm_work X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2007 16:13:58 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 12:11 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > I want to propose making rm_work inherited by default with the following changes: > > * a KEEP_WORK = "1" var in bitbake.conf so it is opt-in > * a KEEP_WORK_pn-${PN} option to mark packages in local.conf > * a KEEP_WORK option in recipes to mark them, e.g. for llvm > > Summary: it will default to 'off' (keep the workdir), but can be switched globally and per > package. > > In the last few weeks that I've used rm_work, I haven't found any big problems with it, > but as Graeme points out, there is no easy way to disable yet. > > What do you think? As I see it, rm_work is a policy which can be applied by an individual or a distro. I don't think it should be mandatory but if certain distros wish to use it be default, that is up to them and I'm fine with that. Cheers, Richard