From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [81.169.178.128] (helo=h6563.serverkompetenz.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HayU2-0001fm-0O for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 09 Apr 2007 20:20:54 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by h6563.serverkompetenz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35D74308207 for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2007 20:20:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from h6563.serverkompetenz.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (h6563 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22646-07 for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2007 20:20:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mhcln04.hentges.priv (xdsl-213-196-243-76.netcologne.de [213.196.243.76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by h6563.serverkompetenz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D016C3081E7 for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2007 20:20:29 +0200 (CEST) From: Matthias Hentges To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org In-Reply-To: <461A7AC6.1070809@dominion.kabel.utwente.nl> References: <432beae0704091037s67b6eeb5kf145751af05d1969@mail.gmail.com> <461A7AC6.1070809@dominion.kabel.utwente.nl> Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2007 20:20:28 +0200 Message-Id: <1176142828.4945.11.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.3 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at hentges.net Subject: Re: Multiple mailing list addresses X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2007 18:20:54 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 1780 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-uRS2rtM9Jls9AaKmP6wJ" --=-uRS2rtM9Jls9AaKmP6wJ Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Montag, den 09.04.2007, 19:41 +0200 schrieb Koen Kooi: > where "used to the technology being smart enough to handle things correct= ly" read "too > lazy to check to: and cc: before clicking 'send'" One could argue that the list administrator is too lazy to finally fix the *broken* reply-to field, which breaks the Reply-To-All function of all decent mailers out there. --=20 Matthias 'CoreDump' Hentges=20 Cologne / Germany Webmaster of Hentges.net & Embedded Linux Developer GPG -> gpg --keyserver gpg-keyserver.de --recv-keys 0xAF3030D9 My OS: Debian SID: Geek by Nature, Linux by Choice --=-uRS2rtM9Jls9AaKmP6wJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBGGoPsPXyoPq8wMNkRAor/AJoCTWjIKoOtBTFtgHTyDPMfYo3O9ACfVCIT VsmjTxqTFYYxViXZwf9rx4Y= =pdak -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-uRS2rtM9Jls9AaKmP6wJ--