From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [194.106.48.114] (helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HbYOE-0004vi-IM for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 10:41:18 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3B8fIuq014404 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 09:41:18 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 14346-02 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 09:41:12 +0100 (BST) Received: from max.rpnet.com (max.rpnet.com [192.168.1.15]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3B8fC56014391 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 09:41:12 +0100 From: Richard Purdie To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org In-Reply-To: <200704110855.34007.openembedded@hrw.one.pl> References: <46176E51.2030608@dominion.kabel.utwente.nl> <1176049069.5844.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200704110850.48209.openembedded@hrw.one.pl> <200704110855.34007.openembedded@hrw.one.pl> Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 09:41:11 +0100 Message-Id: <1176280871.5843.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by tim.rpsys.net id l3B8fIuq014404 Subject: Re: [RFC] rm_work X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 08:41:19 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 08:55 +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > Dnia =C5=9Broda, 11 kwietnia 2007, Marcin Juszkiewicz napisa=C5=82: >=20 > > Maybe rm_work.bbclass should do: > > > > BB_DEFAULT_TASK =3D "rm_work" > > addtask rm_work after do_build > > > > But I did not tested it yet (got that idea during Easter). >=20 > Looks like it is a way - atleast it works in Poky: Its a nice way to cheat but that might not work for bitbake 1.6? If it doesn't work for 1.6, it could probably get backported easily enough. I would like to see support for specifying multiple tasks to the addtask syntax though to solve this problem properly. Cheers, Richard