From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Philippe Gerum In-Reply-To: <461F4D88.9030304@domain.hid> References: <46098E8101A344BD@> (added by postmaster@domain.hid) <461F4D88.9030304@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 11:42:59 +0200 Message-Id: <1176457380.4995.69.camel@domain.hid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: Philippe Gerum Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] Xenomai suspends my kernel thread Reply-To: rpm@xenomai.org List-Id: Help regarding installation and common use of Xenomai List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gilles Chanteperdrix Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 11:29 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > Branko wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Gilles Chanteperdrix [mailto:gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org] > >> Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2007 11:16 > >> To: Branko > >> Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org > >> Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] Xenomai suspends my kernel thread > >> > >> Branko wrote: > >> > >>>Hello all! > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>I would be most grateful for your help. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>I ported my PowerPC GNU/Linux C/C++ application to Xenomai. > >>> > >>>When I ran the application everything looked fine. > >>> > >>>However, with more intense data exchange, one of my interrupt handler > >>>threads did not react any longer. > >>> > >>>I looked at the /var/log/messages file and I saw that Xenomai suspended > >>>my thread due to the exception 768. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>According to > >>>https://mail.gna.org/public/xenomai-help/2006-11/msg00233.html I > >>>disabled CONFIG_XENO_OPT_DEBUG > >>> > >>>from my kernel configuration, but the behaviour of my application did > >>>not change. > >> > >> What version of Xenomai do you use ? Does your application use fork ? If > >> yes, then you should switch to Xenomai 2.3.1. > >> > > I use Xenomai 2.3.1. I don't use fork in my application. > > Philippe, Wolfgang, any idea ? > A lot of different situations may lead to a 0x300 exception code (including application errors), not necessarily related to the PTE misses issue we recently fixed for 2.6. Which kernel version, which Adeos patch revision are you using? -- Philippe.