From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Berg Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] pm_ops: add system quiesce/activate hooks Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 00:13:26 +0200 Message-ID: <1176502406.7052.134.camel@johannes.berg> References: <1175810054.3489.34.camel@johannes.berg> <1176499086.7052.124.camel@johannes.berg> <20070413213349.GL28264@elf.ucw.cz> <200704140009.33298.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1644266773==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200704140009.33298.rjw@sisk.pl> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, Pavel Machek List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org --===============1644266773== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-DJkmSs0xVn+bAlUbAmvk" --=-DJkmSs0xVn+bAlUbAmvk Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2007-04-14 at 00:09 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Hmm, I missed that. :-( >=20 > I think we need to make things clear: Either we add the additional hooks = to > pm_ops in which case they should be taken into account in the (u)swsusp c= ode > too, or we don't add them at all. I can do that. I don't care one bit since I will never use pm_ops for suspend to disk anyway. johannes --=-DJkmSs0xVn+bAlUbAmvk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Johannes Berg (powerbook) iD8DBQBGIACG/ETPhpq3jKURAnNUAJ9kAICzxRfXD01Etfz0KLNXjvL1hACghZu7 sZE7LVNFxzLhswDwaxYm0b4= =/ml3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-DJkmSs0xVn+bAlUbAmvk-- --===============1644266773== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline --===============1644266773==--