From: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
To: mikpe@it.uu.se
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Fw: [BUG 2.6.21-rc7] acpi_pm clocksource loses time on x86-64
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 13:12:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1176840764.15198.136.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070417100942.c990604b.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 10:09 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> I guess this counts as a regression.
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 14:16:25 +0200 (MEST)
> From: Mikael Pettersson
> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: [BUG 2.6.21-rc7] acpi_pm clocksource loses time on x86-64
>
>
> The machine is an old Athlon64 laptop (Targa Visionary 811,
> OEMd as the Arima W720-K8, also sold as the eMachines m6805)
> with a VIA K8T800 chipset. ACPI is enabled.
>
> Up to kernel 2.6.20, time-keeping worked fine. In the
> x86-64 kernel, the clock source is listed as "jiffies".
>
> With current 2.6.21-rc7, the x86-64 kernel selects
> acpi_pm as its clock source. Unfortunately, with this
> clock time drifts and it loses several minutes per hour.
>
> What's strange is that the i386 kernel on the same
> machine (with similar .config) does not lose time
> while using the acpi_pm clock source.
Huh. Quite strange as its the same acpi_pm clocksource driver!
The only difference I see right off is that verify_pmtmr_rate() isn't
done on x86_64. Although I'd expect you'd see "PM-Timer running at
invalid rate" w/ the i386 kernel if it made a difference.
Could you send me the dmesg output for both the x86_64 and i386 kernels
you tried?
thanks
-john
next parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-17 20:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20070417100942.c990604b.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2007-04-17 20:12 ` john stultz [this message]
[not found] <200704291524.l3TFOL9j013216@harpo.it.uu.se>
2007-05-02 18:10 ` Fw: [BUG 2.6.21-rc7] acpi_pm clocksource loses time on x86-64 john stultz
2007-05-04 2:38 ` john stultz
2007-05-04 7:42 Mikael Pettersson
2007-05-08 19:14 ` Len Brown
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-05-09 9:11 Mikael Pettersson
2007-05-10 18:52 ` john stultz
2007-05-13 21:30 Mikael Pettersson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1176840764.15198.136.camel@localhost \
--to=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikpe@it.uu.se \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.