From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: RE: using cron in selinux policy From: Karl MacMillan To: Joshua Brindle Cc: Daniel J Walsh , Michael C Thompson , Stephen Smalley , "Christopher J. PeBenito" , SE Linux In-Reply-To: <6FE441CD9F0C0C479F2D88F959B01588A715EF@exchange.columbia.tresys.com> References: <46253DA7.40003@us.ibm.com> <4626175D.7030808@redhat.com> <1176907667.11469.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> <6FE441CD9F0C0C479F2D88F959B01588A715EF@exchange.columbia.tresys.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 11:04:10 -0400 Message-Id: <1176908650.11469.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 10:57 -0400, Joshua Brindle wrote: > > From: Karl MacMillan [mailto:kmacmill@redhat.com] > > > > > > > > Causes the same problem. I also got this to happen with > > > ethereal_per_role_template. Compiler says that the type is defined > > > twice, even though I only see it once. However there is a > > > gen_requires of the type before the declaration which might > > be causing the problem. > > > > > > > That's what is causing the problem - can you just remove the requires? > > Josh - I thought we were going to do promotion of requires at > > one point. > > Did you decide against that? > > > > > We fixed declare-then-require but for some reason which I can't think of > right now did not add promotion of requires. We could fix this now or > wait for the new parser that won't care, how important is this? Seems like there was a good reason not to but I can't think of it right now. I think it is a policy bug - so let's punt. Karl -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.