All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>
To: petkan@nucleusys.com
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb-net/pegasus: fix pegasus carrier detection
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 16:24:46 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1177446286.18030.13.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <58298.85.91.128.158.1177436881.squirrel@nucleusys.com>

On Tue, 2007-04-24 at 20:48 +0300, petkan@nucleusys.com wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 12:49:12PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >>  Long term, Greg seemed OK with moving the net drivers from
> >> drivers/usb/net
> >>  to drivers/usb/net, in line with the current policy of placing net
> >> drivers
> >>  in drivers/net/*, bus agnostic.  After that move, sending to netdev and
> >> me
> >>  (as you did here) would be the preferred avenue.
> >
> > Speaking of which, do you want me to do this in the 2.6.22-rc1
> > timeframe?  Usually big code moves like this are good to do right after
> > rc1 comes out as the major churn is usually completed then.
> 
> Sorry to interfere, but could you guys wait until tomorrow before applying
> the patch to your respective GIT trees?  I'd like to check if the code is
> doing the right thing and avoid patch reversal.

Original problem was that the patch I referenced in the commit message
from Jan 6 2006 switched the return value semantics from
read_mii_word().  Before the patch, read_mii_word returned 1 on success,
0 on error.  After the patch, it returns the generally accepted 0 on
success and !0 on error.

That causes set_carrier() to return immediately rather than fiddle with
netif_carrier_*.  When the Jan 6 2006 patch went in changing the return
values, set_carrier() was not updated for the new return values.
Nothing else in the code cares about read_mii_word()'s return value
except set_carrier().

But when the card is brought up and no cable is plugged in,
intr_callback() gets called repeatedly, which itself repeatedly calls
netif_carrier_on() due to the NO_CARRIER check.  The comment there about
"NO_CARRIER kicks in on TX failure" seems accurate, because even with no
cable plugged in, and therefore no packets getting transmitted, the
NO_CARRIER check is never true on the Belkin part.  Therefore,
netif_carrier_on() is always called as a result of the failure of d[0] &
NO_CARRIER, turning carrier back on even if there is no cable plugged
in.  This bulldozes over the MII carrier_check routine too.

I don't think the intr_callback() code should ever turn the carrier
_on_, because there's that 2*HZ MII carrier check which can certainly
handle the carrier on/off stuff.

LINK_STATUS appears valid on the Belkin part too, so we can add that as
a reverse-quirk and use LINK_STATUS on parts where it works.  If you
think that the NO_CARRIER check should be in _addition_ to the
LINK_STATUS check, that's fine with me, provided that the NO_CARRIER
check only turns carrier off.

Dan



  reply	other threads:[~2007-04-24 20:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-24 14:20 [PATCH] usb-net/pegasus: fix pegasus carrier detection Dan Williams
2007-04-24 16:49 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-04-24 17:04   ` Greg KH
2007-04-24 17:41     ` Jeff Garzik
2007-04-24 17:48     ` petkan
2007-04-24 20:24       ` Dan Williams [this message]
2007-04-25 14:58         ` Petko Manolov
2007-04-25 15:08           ` Dan Williams
2007-04-25 15:09             ` Petko Manolov
2007-04-25 16:03               ` Dan Williams
2007-04-25 16:02                 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-04-26  1:30                   ` [PATCH] usb-net/pegasus: simplify " Dan Williams
2007-04-26  9:12                     ` Petko Manolov
2007-04-28  0:17                     ` Jeff Garzik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1177446286.18030.13.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=dcbw@redhat.com \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=petkan@nucleusys.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.