From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>,
Christian Krafft <krafft@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] generic check_legacy_ioport
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 10:12:20 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1177459940.14873.171.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200704250001.18162.arnd@arndb.de>
On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 00:01 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 April 2007, Olaf Hering wrote:
> >
> > > Do you think a device_type fdc, i8042 or ipmi will appear outside an isa
> > > node?
> >
> > Does anyone know where those ipmi devices appear in the device-tree?
>
> There are actually _no_ ipmi devices that we expect to appear here.
> the reason why the check is in the ipmi driver is in order not to crash
> on powerpc machines that load the ipmi driver but have no ipmi nodes
> in the device tree.
To be totally correct, there might well be, but we shouldn't care.
That is, if a device XXX (let's say XXX is ipmi but it could be i8042 or
whatever else) exist in the device-tree outside of the ISA bus, then it
needs it's own platform or of_platform device to be probed and shouldn't
make the check_legacy_io_port() go true.
There are various cases (especially in embedded world) where "standard"
components have been puts in ASICs but at funky/different addresses, and
they shouldn't be hit by the legacy probe.
Thus, the default implementation of check_legacy_ioport() should only
match things that are under an "isa" bus. Anything else needs to be
handled either by a platform specific check_legacy_ioport() override via
ppc_md (if it's really some legacy stuff and under a fucked up
device-tree) or via driver specific alternate probing method (like an
of_platform_device).
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-25 0:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-17 21:07 [PATCH] generic check_legacy_ioport Olaf Hering
2007-04-17 21:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-04-17 23:28 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-04-20 18:51 ` Olaf Hering
2007-04-22 5:15 ` Milton Miller
2007-04-22 6:46 ` Olaf Hering
2007-04-23 8:15 ` [PATCH] " Olaf Hering
2007-04-24 0:53 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-04-24 11:25 ` Olaf Hering
2007-04-24 15:45 ` Milton Miller
2007-04-24 18:54 ` Olaf Hering
2007-04-24 22:01 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-04-25 0:12 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2007-04-25 1:54 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-04-25 7:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-04-25 13:33 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-04-25 22:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-04-25 0:09 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-04-24 22:34 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-04-25 20:36 ` Olaf Hering
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1177459940.14873.171.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=krafft@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=olaf@aepfle.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.