From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1161473AbXD2Vui@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1161473AbXD2Vui (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:50:38 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161480AbXD2Vui
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:50:38 -0400
Received: from www.osadl.org ([213.239.205.134]:44409 "EHLO mail.tglx.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1161473AbXD2Vtx (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:49:53 -0400
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.21
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reply-To: tglx@linutronix.de
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com>,
       Diego Calleja <diegocg@gmail.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
       Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
       Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>,
       Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20070429212128.GU3468@stusta.de>
References: <p73d51n1fup.fsf@bingen.suse.de>
	 <alpine.LFD.0.98.0704290848360.9964@woody.linux-foundation.org>
	 <20070429173500.GA30248@one.firstfloor.org>
	 <alpine.LFD.0.98.0704291040580.9964@woody.linux-foundation.org>
	 <20070429180909.GA30604@one.firstfloor.org>
	 <20070429214007.9ea12e96.diegocg@gmail.com>
	 <20070429201729.GQ3468@stusta.de>
	 <20070429225657.a501ab5a.diegocg@gmail.com>
	 <20070429211028.GT3468@stusta.de>
	 <6bffcb0e0704291416u402668ffo9bcaafb389228981@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20070429212128.GU3468@stusta.de>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 23:52:01 +0200
Message-Id: <1177883521.5791.156.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sun, 2007-04-29 at 23:21 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >> > It's not great but it's the best clone of you we've found 8)
> >>
> >> What exactly is the purpose of the 2.6.21 regressions list in the Wiki?
> >
> > It's for -stable team.
> >...
> 
> Did Greg or Chris say they have spare time for going through this list?

Don't be silly, did any of the developers say, that he has spare time to
read your regression lists ?

Michal posted it to LKML with the relevant developers in CC including
the stable team, so they are in the loop for updates, which is a Good
Thing!

Hey, you did this yourself. It is a great help and as your lists did,
Michals list pointed me to a bug, which I would have missed otherwise. 

So what are you complaining about ? Folks stepped up and built a
regression list and posted it to LKML. What's wrong with that ?

	tglx