From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [194.106.48.114] (helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1HiWhJ-0005ZZ-95 for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 16:17:49 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3UE8MVR014589; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 15:08:22 +0100 Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 13857-06; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 15:08:19 +0100 (BST) Received: from max.rpnet.com (max.rpnet.com [192.168.1.15]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3UE8IxV014582 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 30 Apr 2007 15:08:18 +0100 From: Richard Purdie To: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions In-Reply-To: <4630B6BC.4090903@dominion.kabel.utwente.nl> References: <1177589176.5843.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4630B6BC.4090903@dominion.kabel.utwente.nl> Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 15:08:18 +0100 Message-Id: <1177942098.5872.37.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: bitbake-dev Subject: Re: Bitbake 1.8.2 released! X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 14:17:49 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 16:27 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > Richard Purdie schreef: > > Bitbake 1.8.2 has been released. > > > > http://prdownload.berlios.de/bitbake/bitbake-1.8.2.tar.gz > > Do we have a concrete date for the 1.8 changeover already? Not that I'm aware of. The release was the first step. I'll wait a few more days and see what other bugs appear (if any) and then I guess we run with the two month changeover. In fact looking at the date, 1st July could be good... Cheers, Richard