From: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@rpsys.net>
To: Paul Sokolovsky <pmiscml@gmail.com>
Cc: Dmitry Krivoschekov <dmitry.krivoschekov@gmail.com>,
kernel-discuss@handhelds.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/4] SoC base drivers
Date: Tue, 01 May 2007 19:58:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1178045891.5883.78.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <97946200.20070501201821@gmail.com>
On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 20:18 +0300, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
> Tuesday, May 1, 2007, 6:01:15 PM, you wrote:
> > A while back I proposed drivers/mfd/ (multi function devices) and there
> > are a couple of drivers in there in mainline which probably fit your
> > description of SoC. The code I had once intended for there is probably
> > more ASoC related now...
>
> Well, while description catches the essence of course, TLA is
> far from being perfect: 1) Completely unknown; 2) can be easily
> confused with mtd.
>
> But it's even more funny: there *is* drivers/mfd/ already in
> mainline. I'd say that we were blind, but even you say "proposed", not
> "exists", nor anybody else brought that to attention. I'm afraid, that
> proves point 1 above ;-).
"there are a couple of drivers in there in mainline" implies I knew of
its existence ;-).
As for your second point, most users will just see "Multi Function" or
"Memory Technology" which should be different enough.
Cheers,
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-01 18:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-01 5:08 [RFC, PATCH 0/4] SoC base drivers Paul Sokolovsky
2007-05-01 8:39 ` Ben Dooks
2007-05-01 10:11 ` Paul Sokolovsky
2007-05-01 10:33 ` ian
2007-05-01 13:53 ` Dmitry Krivoschekov
2007-05-01 14:36 ` Paul Sokolovsky
2007-05-01 15:01 ` Richard Purdie
2007-05-01 17:18 ` Paul Sokolovsky
2007-05-01 18:58 ` Richard Purdie [this message]
2007-05-01 19:27 ` Russell King
2007-05-01 16:29 ` Dmitry Krivoschekov
2007-05-01 18:08 ` [Kernel-discuss] " ian
2007-05-01 19:08 ` Dmitry Krivoschekov
2007-05-01 20:09 ` Paul Sokolovsky
2007-05-01 21:17 ` Dmitry Krivoschekov
2007-05-02 13:39 ` Paul Sokolovsky
2007-05-01 15:55 ` ian
2007-05-01 16:38 ` Dmitry Krivoschekov
2007-05-01 17:12 ` Paul Sokolovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1178045891.5883.78.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=rpurdie@rpsys.net \
--cc=dmitry.krivoschekov@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-discuss@handhelds.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmiscml@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.