From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: jeff@garzik.org, mjg59@srcf.ucam.org, rdunlap@xenotime.net,
alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, forrest.zhao@gmail.com,
lenb@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, hare@suse.de,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, htejun@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCHSET] libata: improve ATA ACPI support, take#2
Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 23:50:37 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <11783766373569-git-send-email-htejun@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To:
Hello, all.
This is the second take of improve-ATA-ACPI-support patchset. Changes
from the last take[L] are...
* s/atadev/dev/
* s/do_drive_get_GTF/ata_dev_get_GTF/
* s/do_drive_set_taskfiles/ata_dev_set_taskfiles/
As I wrote in the previous thread, I don't think automatically
matching ACPI nodes to ATA ports and devices is a good idea or can be
done safely, so I left that part alone. If you've got better ideas,
be my guest. But with or without it, this patchset fixes a whole
bunch of problem and makes ATA ACPI support sane. For more info,
please read the following message.
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ide/17554
This patchset is against...
libata-dev#upstream(225036314e768bbfe8331ea9b0e91ca101afe427)
+ [1] libata-acpi-fix-GTF-command-protocol-for-ATAPI
Thanks.
--
tejun
[L] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ide/18127
[1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ide/18122
next reply other threads:[~2007-05-05 15:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-05 14:50 Tejun Heo [this message]
2007-05-05 14:50 ` [PATCH 01/11] libata: separate out ata_dev_reread_id() Tejun Heo
2007-05-05 14:50 ` [PATCH 05/11] libata-acpi: add ATA_FLAG_ACPI_SATA port flag Tejun Heo
2007-05-05 14:50 ` [PATCH 04/11] libata-acpi: clean up parameters and misc stuff Tejun Heo
2007-05-05 14:50 ` [PATCH 06/11] libata-acpi: implement ata_acpi_associate() Tejun Heo
2007-05-05 14:50 ` [PATCH 03/11] libata-acpi: s/CONFIG_SATA_ACPI/CONFIG_ATA_ACPI/ Tejun Heo
2007-05-11 22:13 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-05-05 14:50 ` [PATCH 02/11] libata: during revalidation, check n_sectors after device is configured Tejun Heo
2007-05-05 14:50 ` [PATCH 07/11] libata-acpi: clean up ata_acpi_exec_tfs() Tejun Heo
2007-05-05 14:50 ` [PATCH 11/11] libata-acpi: implement _GTM/_STM support Tejun Heo
2007-05-05 14:50 ` [PATCH 09/11] libata: reimplement ACPI invocation Tejun Heo
2007-05-05 14:50 ` [PATCH 10/11] libata-acpi: remove redundant checks Tejun Heo
2007-05-05 14:50 ` [PATCH 08/11] libata-acpi: miscellaneous cleanups Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=11783766373569-git-send-email-htejun@gmail.com \
--to=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=forrest.zhao@gmail.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.