From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hollis Blanchard Subject: Re: Xen on top of xen Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 10:45:48 -0500 Message-ID: <1178811948.10738.4.camel@basalt> References: <907625E08839C4409CE5768403633E0B018E1CDC@sefsexmb1.amd.com> <200705101112.38005.mark.williamson@cl.cam.ac.uk> Reply-To: Hollis Blanchard Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200705101112.38005.mark.williamson@cl.cam.ac.uk> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Mark Williamson Cc: "Petersson, Mats" , Koripella Srinivas , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 11:12 +0100, Mark Williamson wrote: > > Do you (or anyone else) know if the PPC version supports nested > > virtualization? > > I know z/VM supports it (no surprise - z/VM supports all sort of crazy but > cool things), and it seems like the kind of thing IBM might do - precisely > for management reasons ;-) I would guess that the PPC version of Xen doesn't > support it (yet) but maybe the POWER hypervisor does? I've cc-ed Hollis > who'll be able to set the record straight :-) The hardware extensions defined in the Power Architecture do not support nested virtualization. -- Hollis Blanchard IBM Linux Technology Center