* Re: RFC: machine customized ixp4xx NPE firmware
@ 2007-05-16 14:32 Mark Gollahon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Mark Gollahon @ 2007-05-16 14:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1103 bytes --]
Richard Purdie wrote ..
>
> A neat way to handle this might be to define:
>
> IXPMACHINES = "nslu2|ixp4xx|whatever"
>
> and then the ixp specific .bb's check IXPMACHINES rather than a specific
> list. The list would then be maintained in one place and is easily
> updated if anyone adds a new ixp like machine.
>
> I've not looked at the specifics, its just a random idea I had...
>
> Cheers,
>
> Richard
I want to second this approach as I tried awhile back to build OE for an IXP4XX-based machine that came into my possession and, during that time, ended up patching several IXP-specific .bb's to add my new machine. My work would have been much easier had IXPMACHINES existed.
(NOTE: I did get it almost completely working, the only problem ended up being the networking ports didn't work, which, for a firewall machine, meant the device was useless. There is an IC175 switch chip sitting between the IXP's two network ports and the physical ports and I couldn't figure out how to hack the IXP net driver to get the IC175 to pass eth frames.)
Regards,
-Mark Gollahon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* RFC: machine customized ixp4xx NPE firmware
@ 2007-05-15 11:22 Robin Farine
2007-05-15 18:38 ` Leon Woestenberg
2007-05-16 1:24 ` Rod Whitby
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Robin Farine @ 2007-05-15 11:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel
Hello everyone,
The platform I am working on is using NPE-B and NPE-C as Ethernet
interfaces. The ixp4xx-npe package from the OE snapshot I am
currently
using builds firmware for NPE-B only and the firmware type is
hard-coded
in "IxNpeMicrocode.h".
The patch below proposes a means of letting the machine
configuration file
decide which NPE firmware to build.
Another but somewhat related point is the COMPATIBLE_MACHINE
variable. If
my machine's name does not start with nslug or ixp4xx, I am forced
to
change many package recipes (I suspect it is a FAQ but I do not seem
to
able to access the mailing-list archive at the moment), perhaps a
COMPATIBLE_ARCH variable would be help here ?
Thanks,
Robin
diff --git
a/packages/ixp4xx/ixp4xx-npe-native-2.3.2/IxNpeMicrocode.h
b/packages/ixp4xx/ixp4xx-npe-native-2.3.2/IxNpeMicrocode.h
--- a/packages/ixp4xx/ixp4xx-npe-native-2.3.2/IxNpeMicrocode.h
+++ b/packages/ixp4xx/ixp4xx-npe-native-2.3.2/IxNpeMicrocode.h
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
// #define IX_NPEDL_NPEIMAGE_NPEB_DMA
// #define
IX_NPEDL_NPEIMAGE_NPEB_ETH_SPAN_FIREWALL_VLAN_QOS_HDR_CONV
// #define
IX_NPEDL_NPEIMAGE_NPEB_ETH_LEARN_FILTER_SPAN_FIREWALL_VLAN_QOS
-#define IX_NPEDL_NPEIMAGE_NPEB_ETH_LEARN_FILTER_SPAN_FIREWALL
+// #define IX_NPEDL_NPEIMAGE_NPEB_ETH_LEARN_FILTER_SPAN_FIREWALL
// #define
IX_NPEDL_NPEIMAGE_NPEC_ETH_SPAN_MASK_FIREWALL_VLAN_QOS_HDR_CONV_EXTMIB
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@
// #define IX_NPEDL_NPEIMAGE_NPEC_DMA
// #define IX_NPEDL_NPEIMAGE_NPEC_CRYPTO_AES_ETH_LEARN_FILTER_SPAN
// #define
IX_NPEDL_NPEIMAGE_NPEC_CRYPTO_AES_ETH_LEARN_FILTER_FIREWALL
-#define IX_NPEDL_NPEIMAGE_NPEC_CRYPTO_AES_CCM_ETH
+// #define IX_NPEDL_NPEIMAGE_NPEC_CRYPTO_AES_CCM_ETH
// #define
IX_NPEDL_NPEIMAGE_NPEC_CRYPTO_ETH_LEARN_FILTER_SPAN_FIREWALL
// #define
IX_NPEDL_NPEIMAGE_NPEC_ETH_SPAN_FIREWALL_VLAN_QOS_HDR_CONV
// #define
IX_NPEDL_NPEIMAGE_NPEC_ETH_LEARN_FILTER_SPAN_FIREWALL_VLAN_QOS
diff --git a/packages/ixp4xx/ixp4xx-npe-native_2.3.2.bb
b/packages/ixp4xx/ixp4xx-npe-native_2.3.2.bb
--- a/packages/ixp4xx/ixp4xx-npe-native_2.3.2.bb
+++ b/packages/ixp4xx/ixp4xx-npe-native_2.3.2.bb
@@ -7,9 +7,14 @@ inherit native
inherit native
S = "${WORKDIR}/ixp400_xscale_sw/src/npeDl"
+# A space-separated list of CPP defines that select the firmware
images
+# to build for the target machine.
+IXP4XX_NPE_FIRWMARE_DEFINES ?= "\
+-DIX_NPEDL_NPEIMAGE_NPEB_ETH_LEARN_FILTER_SPAN_FIREWALL"
+
do_compile() {
mv ${WORKDIR}/IxNpeMicrocode.h ${S}/
- gcc -Wall IxNpeMicrocode.c -o IxNpeMicrocode
+ gcc -Wall ${IXP4XX_NPE_FIRWMARE_DEFINES} IxNpeMicrocode.c -o
IxNpeMicrocode
}
do_stage() {
diff --git a/packages/ixp4xx/ixp4xx-npe_2.3.2.bb
b/packages/ixp4xx/ixp4xx-npe_2.3.2.bb
--- a/packages/ixp4xx/ixp4xx-npe_2.3.2.bb
+++ b/packages/ixp4xx/ixp4xx-npe_2.3.2.bb
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ S = "${WORKDIR}/ixp400_xscale_sw/src/npe
COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "(nslu2|ixp4xx)"
-FILES_${PN} = "${base_libdir}/firmware/NPE-B"
+FILES_${PN} = "${base_libdir}/firmware/NPE-*"
do_compile() {
${STAGING_BINDIR_NATIVE}/IxNpeMicrocode-${PV} -be
@@ -21,13 +21,20 @@ do_compile() {
do_install() {
install -d ${D}/${base_libdir}/firmware/
- rm ${S}/NPE-B
- mv ${S}/NPE-B.* ${S}/NPE-B
- install ${S}/NPE-B ${D}/${base_libdir}/firmware/
+ for npe in A B C; do
+ rm ${S}/NPE-${npe} 2>/dev/null || true
+ mv ${S}/NPE-${npe}.* ${S}/NPE-${npe} 2>/dev/null || true
+ if test -f ${S}/NPE-${npe}; then
+ install -m 644 ${S}/NPE-${npe} ${D}/${base_libdir}/firmware/
+ fi
+ done
}
do_populate_staging() {
install -d ${STAGING_FIRMWARE_DIR}
- install ${S}/NPE-B ${STAGING_FIRMWARE_DIR}/
+ for npe in A B C; do
+ if test -f ${S}/NPE-${npe}; then
+ install -m 644 ${S}/NPE-${npe} ${STAGING_FIRMWARE_DIR}/
+ fi
+ done
}
-
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: RFC: machine customized ixp4xx NPE firmware
2007-05-15 11:22 Robin Farine
@ 2007-05-15 18:38 ` Leon Woestenberg
2007-05-15 20:17 ` Robin Farine
2007-05-16 1:24 ` Rod Whitby
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Leon Woestenberg @ 2007-05-15 18:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel
Hello Robin,
On 5/15/07, Robin Farine <robin.farine@terminus.org> wrote:
> +IXP4XX_NPE_FIRWMARE_DEFINES ?= "\
> +-DIX_NPEDL_NPEIMAGE_NPEB_ETH_LEARN_FILTER_SPAN_FIREWALL"
> +
> do_compile() {
> mv ${WORKDIR}/IxNpeMicrocode.h ${S}/
> - gcc -Wall IxNpeMicrocode.c -o IxNpeMicrocode
> + gcc -Wall ${IXP4XX_NPE_FIRWMARE_DEFINES} IxNpeMicrocode.c -o
>
Please change IXP4XX_NPE_FIRWMARE_DEFINES into IXP4X
IX_NPE_FIRMWARE_DEFINES.
The idea looks ok.
Regards,
Leon.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: RFC: machine customized ixp4xx NPE firmware
2007-05-15 18:38 ` Leon Woestenberg
@ 2007-05-15 20:17 ` Robin Farine
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Robin Farine @ 2007-05-15 20:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel
On Tuesday May 15 2007 20:38, Leon Woestenberg wrote:
> On 5/15/07, Robin Farine <robin.farine@terminus.org> wrote:
> > +IXP4XX_NPE_FIRWMARE_DEFINES ?= "\
> > +-DIX_NPEDL_NPEIMAGE_NPEB_ETH_LEARN_FILTER_SPAN_FIREWALL"
> > +
> > do_compile() {
> > mv ${WORKDIR}/IxNpeMicrocode.h ${S}/
> > - gcc -Wall IxNpeMicrocode.c -o IxNpeMicrocode
> > + gcc -Wall ${IXP4XX_NPE_FIRWMARE_DEFINES}
> > IxNpeMicrocode.c -o
>
> Please change IXP4XX_NPE_FIRWMARE_DEFINES into IXP4X
> IX_NPE_FIRMWARE_DEFINES.
Ah, you mean s/FIRWMARE/FIRMWARE/, yes, makes sense :-). I'll fix
this and submit the patch to the bug tracker.
> The idea looks ok.
Thanks for reviewing it.
Regards,
Robin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: RFC: machine customized ixp4xx NPE firmware
2007-05-15 11:22 Robin Farine
2007-05-15 18:38 ` Leon Woestenberg
@ 2007-05-16 1:24 ` Rod Whitby
2007-05-16 8:56 ` Robin Farine
2007-05-16 10:44 ` Richard Purdie
1 sibling, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Rod Whitby @ 2007-05-16 1:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel
Robin Farine wrote:
> The platform I am working on is using NPE-B and NPE-C as Ethernet
> interfaces. The ixp4xx-npe package from the OE snapshot I am
> currently
> using builds firmware for NPE-B only and the firmware type is
> hard-coded
> in "IxNpeMicrocode.h".
>
> The patch below proposes a means of letting the machine
> configuration file
> decide which NPE firmware to build.
Thanks. We'll be very happy to apply that patch. I'll take a close
look at it tonight.
> Another but somewhat related point is the COMPATIBLE_MACHINE
> variable. If
> my machine's name does not start with nslug or ixp4xx, I am forced
> to
> change many package recipes (I suspect it is a FAQ but I do not seem
> to
> able to access the mailing-list archive at the moment), perhaps a
> COMPATIBLE_ARCH variable would be help here ?
Which machine/arch are you using? We can easily extend that
compatibility to include any other machines/archs that will use it.
-- Rod
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: RFC: machine customized ixp4xx NPE firmware
2007-05-16 1:24 ` Rod Whitby
@ 2007-05-16 8:56 ` Robin Farine
2007-05-16 10:44 ` Richard Purdie
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Robin Farine @ 2007-05-16 8:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel
On Wed May 16 2007 03:24, Rod Whitby wrote:
> Robin Farine wrote:
> > The patch below proposes a means of letting the machine
> > configuration file
> > decide which NPE firmware to build.
>
> Thanks. We'll be very happy to apply that patch. I'll take a
> close look at it tonight.
I forgot to disable line wrapping when I reposted it to the correct
mailing-list... You may prefer to have a look at the cleaner
version in bugzilla.
> Which machine/arch are you using? We can easily extend that
> compatibility to include any other machines/archs that will use
> it.
Its a custom ixp425 big-endian board of which 2 functional exemplars
currently exist :-). Not a problem, I just wondered whether
something like COMPATIBLE_ARCH exists.
Robin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: RFC: machine customized ixp4xx NPE firmware
2007-05-16 1:24 ` Rod Whitby
2007-05-16 8:56 ` Robin Farine
@ 2007-05-16 10:44 ` Richard Purdie
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Richard Purdie @ 2007-05-16 10:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel
On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 10:54 +0930, Rod Whitby wrote:
> Robin Farine wrote:
> > Another but somewhat related point is the COMPATIBLE_MACHINE
> > variable. If
> > my machine's name does not start with nslug or ixp4xx, I am forced
> > to
> > change many package recipes (I suspect it is a FAQ but I do not seem
> > to
> > able to access the mailing-list archive at the moment), perhaps a
> > COMPATIBLE_ARCH variable would be help here ?
>
> Which machine/arch are you using? We can easily extend that
> compatibility to include any other machines/archs that will use it.
A neat way to handle this might be to define:
IXPMACHINES = "nslu2|ixp4xx|whatever"
and then the ixp specific .bb's check IXPMACHINES rather than a specific
list. The list would then be maintained in one place and is easily
updated if anyone adds a new ixp like machine.
I've not looked at the specifics, its just a random idea I had...
Cheers,
Richard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-05-16 14:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-05-16 14:32 RFC: machine customized ixp4xx NPE firmware Mark Gollahon
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-05-15 11:22 Robin Farine
2007-05-15 18:38 ` Leon Woestenberg
2007-05-15 20:17 ` Robin Farine
2007-05-16 1:24 ` Rod Whitby
2007-05-16 8:56 ` Robin Farine
2007-05-16 10:44 ` Richard Purdie
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.