From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Lesh Subject: Re: RFC: submodule terminology Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 17:32:49 -0700 Message-ID: <1179707569.11098.1.camel@localhost> References: <20070520214417.GM5412@admingilde.org> <200705210006.47266.johan@herland.net> <20070520230352.GQ5412@admingilde.org> <200705210116.25079.johan@herland.net> <20070520233913.GT5412@admingilde.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Johan Herland , git@vger.kernel.org To: Martin Waitz X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon May 21 06:29:46 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HpzWj-0000NP-D0 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 21 May 2007 06:29:45 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757292AbXEUE3h (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 May 2007 00:29:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757377AbXEUE3h (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 May 2007 00:29:37 -0400 Received: from smtp-4.smtp.ucla.edu ([169.232.46.137]:39026 "EHLO smtp-4.smtp.ucla.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757292AbXEUE3f (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 May 2007 00:29:35 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 2061 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Mon, 21 May 2007 00:29:35 EDT Received: from mail.ucla.edu (mail.ucla.edu [169.232.48.151]) by smtp-4.smtp.ucla.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l4L3t2wd025874; Sun, 20 May 2007 20:55:02 -0700 Received: from [169.232.244.64] (wl-s244-64.resnet.ucla.edu [169.232.244.64]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.ucla.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l4L3t1on030268 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT); Sun, 20 May 2007 20:55:01 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20070520233913.GT5412@admingilde.org> X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.1 X-Probable-Spam: no X-Scanned-By: smtp.ucla.edu on 169.232.46.137 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 01:39 +0200, Martin Waitz wrote: > hoi :) > > On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 01:16:24AM +0200, Johan Herland wrote: > > The term "gitlink" is ambiguous/confusing? I didn't know. What's the > > other meaning of gitlink? > > there was some talk about lightweight checkouts using some .gitlink > file instead of a .git directory. > This was my project, but if I end up trying to do lightweight checkouts I'll avoid a .gitlink file most likely (and go with something in .git/config instead). Gitlink is therefore quite safe. -Eric