All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Glenn Terjesen <glenn@webcat.no>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: RE: is it possible to block ip packets that contains experimental tcp options ?
Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 13:55:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1179748544.32083.25.camel@bathory.webcat.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1179747134.32083.19.camel@bathory.webcat.no>

Was a little to fast there..

iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp --tcp-flags ALL ALL -j DROP
iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp --tcp-flags ALL NONE -j DROP

did not fix it..

Im gonna take a look at the Paul Blondé suggestion and just ignore the
traffic I suppose..


On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 13:32 +0200, Glenn Terjesen wrote:
> Hi,
> What i meant with "experimental tcp options" is that my ids (snort)
> keept logging these "experimental tcp options"
> 
> #
> code 76
> length 8
> data 01019DEDBEF00005
> 
> I know this aint a snort list, but my servers don't serve any services
> that require this kind of traffic.
> 
> So i was wondering if iptables has any way of blocking these.
> 
> These to magic lines fixed it all
> iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp --tcp-flags ALL ALL -j DROP
> iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp --tcp-flags ALL NONE -j DROP
> 
> 
> Thanks alot for the help.
> 
> 
> On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 13:18 -0400, Marc Cozzi wrote:
> >  Paul,
> > 
> > I believe that's correct. Although I'm still not
> > Sure what was originally meant by "experimental tcp options".
> > 
> >   -marc
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Paul Blondé [mailto:jpb@entel.ca] 
> > > Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 11:09 AM
> > > To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
> > > Subject: RE: is it possible to block ip packets that contains 
> > > experimentaltcp options ?
> > > 
> > > I assume that LOG-AND-DROP is your own chain, crafted so that 
> > > you can perform both functions with a single entry?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > Paul Blondé
> > >  
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
> > > > [mailto:netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org] On Behalf Of 
> > > Marc Cozzi
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 5:19 AM
> > > > To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
> > > > Subject: RE: is it possible to block ip packets that contains 
> > > > experimentaltcp options ?
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Glenn,
> > > > 
> > > > Not sure what you mean by "experimental" however, there are some 
> > > > conditions of flags that should never occur on the network. 
> > > These can 
> > > > be trapped with rules similar to the following.
> > > > 
> > > > iptables -A BLOCKED -m state --state INVALID -j 
> > > LOG-AND-DROP iptables 
> > > > -A BLOCKED -p tcp --tcp-flags ALL ALL -j LOG-AND-DROP iptables -A 
> > > > BLOCKED -p tcp --tcp-flags ALL NONE -j LOG-AND-DROP
> > > > 
> > > >   --marc
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Glenn Terjesen [mailto:glenn@webcat.no]
> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 5:24 AM
> > > > > To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
> > > > > Subject: is it possible to block ip packets that contains 
> > > > > experimental tcp options ?
> > > > > 
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > > got a iptables firewall filtering our servers.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Is it possible to block tcp packets that contains 
> > > experimental tcp 
> > > > > options ?
> > > > > 
> > > > > AND is it smart to do so ?
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > --
> > > > > Mvh Glenn Terjesen @ Webcat AS
> > > > > Tlf: +47 37 02 20 20
> > > > > E-post: support@webcat.no
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-21 11:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-17 17:18 is it possible to block ip packets that contains experimental tcp options ? Marc Cozzi
2007-05-17 17:25 ` is it possible to block ip packets that contains experimentaltcp " Paul Blondé
2007-05-21 11:32 ` is it possible to block ip packets that contains experimental tcp " Glenn Terjesen
2007-05-21 11:55   ` Glenn Terjesen [this message]
2007-05-21 18:27   ` Pascal Hambourg
2007-05-22  8:58     ` Glenn Terjesen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-05-16 12:18 Marc Cozzi
2007-05-16 18:04 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-16  9:23 Glenn Terjesen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1179748544.32083.25.camel@bathory.webcat.no \
    --to=glenn@webcat.no \
    --cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.