From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Williamson Subject: Re: new repo layout? Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 08:39:46 -0600 Message-ID: <1180967986.6221.133.camel@bling> References: <20070530214638.GA21589@fc.hp.com> <1180598644.29571.57.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1180627325.16734.26.camel@basalt> <1180628637.29571.84.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1180628637.29571.84.camel@localhost.localdomain> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Ian Campbell Cc: Aron Griffis , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Hollis Blanchard List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Hi Ian, I see the sparse tree has been removed from staging now. How do you envision architecture maintained trees fit into this new build system? For instance, I'd like for a tree cloned from xen-ia64-unstable.hg to pull a linux-2.6.18-xen-ia64.hg tree rather than the default upstream tree. I see there's support for cloning linux-2.6.18-xen.hg from a directory, but it would be quite an error prone kludge to sneak different arch trees in that way. Thoughts? Thanks, Alex -- Alex Williamson HP Open Source & Linux Org.