From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hollis Blanchard Subject: Re: new repo layout? Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 14:15:35 -0500 Message-ID: <1180984535.29109.6.camel@basalt> References: <20070530214638.GA21589@fc.hp.com> <1180598644.29571.57.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1180627325.16734.26.camel@basalt> <1180628637.29571.84.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1180967986.6221.133.camel@bling> <1180973667.4041.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1180977928.6221.144.camel@bling> <1180979173.29109.4.camel@basalt> <1180983761.6221.160.camel@bling> Reply-To: Hollis Blanchard Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1180983761.6221.160.camel@bling> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Alex Williamson Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, James Bulpin , Aron Griffis , Ian Campbell , xen-ppc-devel , xen-ia64-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 13:02 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 12:46 -0500, Hollis Blanchard wrote: > > On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 11:25 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote: > > > > > > > Another option would be to move the ia64 and ppc trees into separate > > > > subdirectories of /ext/. I'm open to other alternatives. > > > > > > So far, this sounds like the best option. This way it would work > > > just like the staging tree builds and would hopefully be less likely > > > to get broken. We might also gain some flexibility in being able to > > > create new repos in the subdirectory. Thanks, > > > > If you're suggesting moving all PPC repositories, including the Linux > > tree, into http://xenbits.xensource.com/ext/powerpc/ , then that's fine > > with me. > > Yep, I think this is the way to go. So we'll have: > > http://xenbits.xensource.com/ext/powerpc/ > http://xenbits.xensource.com/ext/ia64/ > > Each will have a linux-2.6.18-xen.hg repo in it that will be maintained > by the arch maintainers and used for pulls into upstream. The default > arch Xen branch needs to be moved into the directory as well. I also > think it might be good to standardize on names. I'd like the > xen-ia64-unstable.hg repo to be renamed to xen-unstable.hg. This way > we'll end up with common names like: > > /xen-unstable.hg > /linux-2.6.18-xen.hg > /staging/xen-unstable.hg > /staging/linux-2.6.18-xen.hg > /ext/ia64/xen-unstable.hg > /ext/ia64/linux-2.6.18-xen.hg > > Sound good? Thanks, Sounds good to me. -- Hollis Blanchard IBM Linux Technology Center