All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Celso <celsopr@gmail.com>
To: Miguel Figueiredo <elmig@debianpt.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: -ck patch | Feedback
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 17:52:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1181494360.4026.10.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <466A7321.4060304@debianpt.org>

Sáb, 2007-06-09 às 10:30 +0100, Miguel Figueiredo escreveu:
> Celso wrote:
> > Hello, I'm using -ck since... along time ago (I start using it with the
> > kernel 2.6.16) . I started using it with Ubuntu and  the response of the
> > system  was better. Since that I always compile my kernels with -ck.
> > Actually I use 2.6.20-ck1 and I have no problems, even with things that
> > needs kernel-sources like gspca for my webcam.
> > 
> > Thanks a lot for the patches. 
> > 
> > PS: when will this go into the official kernel?
> > 
> 
> Hi there,
> 
>   have you tryied a newer kernel with -ck2 [1] ?
> 
> I am also using a -ck patch, 2.6.21-ck2, mostly on 2 machines where i
> use as desktop and also play games. With -ck2 the experience seems less
> slugish and more smooth while playing 'second life' and have a bunch of
> other programs open (mail, a zillion web pages, irc client, feed reader,
> consoles, ...).
> The desktop seems more confortable to use than with the vanilla kernel.
> I also tryed cfs, it's also much better than the vanilla kernel but i
> still prefer -ck2 for playing second life as it feels more responsive.
> 
> 
> If you try the -ck2 or SD 1.0 please report your experience. It's nice
> to hear that people are testing/using these improvements on desktop usage.
> 
> 
> 
> 1 - ck2 patch to add to vanilla 2.6.21,
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/ck/patches/2.6/2.6.21/2.6.21-ck2/patch-2.6.21-ck2.bz2
> 
> PS: I remember i read somewhere that the SD patch (included in -ck) has
> became stable (version 1.0) with a few small improvements!
> 

Well, I upgrade to 2.6.21-ck2 and install it on my two pcs (I had before
2.6.20-ck1 on both) and the installation work, like always, fine. No
problems. On the pc I use most (the better one :) ) I didn't feel much
difference from 2.6.20-ck1 to 2.6.21-ck2 (for regular Desktop use), but
in the older pc, where my brother works, he says that was even more
"fluid"*.

* direct translation sorry if it doesn't sound well


  reply	other threads:[~2007-06-10 16:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-06-08 22:17 -ck patch | Feedback Celso
2007-06-09  9:30 ` Miguel Figueiredo
2007-06-10 16:52   ` Celso [this message]
2007-06-10 22:10     ` 2.6.22-rc4-ck1 - " Miguel Figueiredo
2007-06-11 22:17       ` Miguel Pais

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1181494360.4026.10.camel@localhost \
    --to=celsopr@gmail.com \
    --cc=elmig@debianpt.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.