From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chandra Seetharaman Subject: Re: setup Pathpriority manually Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 11:57:47 -0700 Message-ID: <1182452267.5301.123.camel@linuxchandra> References: Reply-To: sekharan@us.ibm.com, device-mapper development Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com To: device-mapper development Cc: dm-cvs@sourceware.org List-Id: dm-devel.ids On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 20:13 +0200, Markus wrote: > Hi, > > i do have an active-passive Storage where the LUN could be used by > both Controllers but one is bloody slow. I tried all > /sbin/mpath_prio_* ways do determin which is the "active" one but none > of them worked. Is there a way to set this manually? Is there a > different way to determin which is which rather than using the > existing Commands? If your device is not one of the supported devices, you can ask the vendor about how to determine the active and passive paths. mpath_prio_tpc is a good example of how the active/passive device information is used to determine the path priority. > > Thanks in advance > Markus > > -- > dm-devel mailing list > dm-devel@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Chandra Seetharaman | Be careful what you choose.... - sekharan@us.ibm.com | .......you may get it. ----------------------------------------------------------------------