From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [XenPPC] Re: [PATCH 3 of 6] [XEN][LINUX] Add
	architecture-generic xencomm infrastructure
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2007 16:52:15 -0500
Message-ID: <1183672335.14342.54.camel@basalt>
References: <C2B324C1.A64F%keir@xensource.com>
Reply-To: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <C2B324C1.A64F%keir@xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Keir Fraser <keir@xensource.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, xen-ppc-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 22:44 +0100, Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 5/7/07 22:35, "Hollis Blanchard" <hollisb@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> >>> +config XEN_XENCOMM
> >>> + bool
> >>> +
> >> 
> >> Shouldn't this have a 'depends on', and 'default y'?
> > 
> > This will be "selected" by architectures that need it.
> 
> If that means it is automatically be handled by the build system and won't
> appear in 'make menuconfig' then that's fine.

Yup, that's exactly what will happen.

-- 
Hollis Blanchard
IBM Linux Technology Center