Re: UBI: Can we handle -EINTR differently in erase/write path???

[Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@infradead.org>]

On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 11:37 +0530, Vinit Agnihotri wrote:
> Hi heres few code snip from erase_worker(); from wl.c
> if (err != -EIO) {
>         /*
>          * If this is not %-EIO, we have no idea what to do. Scheduling
>          * this physical eraseblock for erasure again would cause
>          * errors again and again. Well, lets switch to RO mode.
>          */
>         ubi_ro_mode(ubi);
>         return err;
>     }
> Suppose while erasure in progress & someone pressed "Ctrl+C" then UBI
> straight way marks entire device as Read only & its really painful
> because then you cant even delete that volume as UBI is read only.
> Which I guess its not good way. If use cases are considered it is
> highly likely that user can hit "Ctrl+c" , like he want to cancel
> erase at that time or something like that. So we can handle -EINTR
> differently by following way

Please, feel free to ignore my silly question and just send the
patch :-)

-- 
Best regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)