From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@infradead.org>
To: Florin Malita <fmalita@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] UBI: potential leak in ubi_scan_erase_peb
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 10:25:57 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1184916357.25822.2.camel@sauron> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <469FBA01.80107@gmail.com>
On Thu, 2007-07-19 at 15:22 -0400, Florin Malita wrote:
> Coverity (1769) found the following problem: if the erase counter
> overflow check triggers, ec_hdr is leaked.
>
> Moving the allocation after the overflow check should take care of it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Florin Malita <fmalita@gmail.com>
Committed, thank you!
--
Best regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-20 7:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-19 19:22 [PATCH] UBI: potential leak in ubi_scan_erase_peb Florin Malita
2007-07-20 7:25 ` Artem Bityutskiy [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1184916357.25822.2.camel@sauron \
--to=dedekind@infradead.org \
--cc=fmalita@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.